Luca Barbareschi, in the opening monologue of the first episode of his new television talk, copy Spinoza.it, however badly reciting his lines. This makes his "Barbary Sciock" from what at first I suspected: a tragedy waiting to happen. Plagiarism is an ugly fact, and certainly unbearable, but there is also something much more serious. Also of Barbary.
In opening monologue, as mentioned copied, Barbareschi ago satirical jokes - rather harmless, to be precise - the present. And it does so while simultaneously was a member of the PDL in the House . The two are irreconcilable and contradictory and there to give the appearance of a triple aspect, a grave, a very serious and very serious one. Let's take a quick example of what could happen during his talk show.
serious Appearance: Barbary is a satirical joke on the legitimacy impediment, a joke that puts a bad light on the measure, but then in the House - as a Member of the PDL - voted in favor of that measure. Here one is caught in a contradiction besides an ambiguity. If the satire is - and is - an expression of free point of view, here Barbareschi there would fully understand his is against the legitimate ground (which is why the joke is satirical) or they have to (why vote in favor of the measure in Parliament)? I'm sorry, Barbaresco, but this ambiguity, the satire is not granted.
look very serious : Barbary makes no reference to such failure. Precisely because of that political party member who is trying to approve the measure. Satire can accept such an attitude? I could be rude and say "no", but I will pacato e dirò invece: ma neanche per sogno!! Il legittimo impedimento è senz'altro materiale satirico, va analizzato con gli strumenti della satira, strumenti che sono sempre impostati su un fronte di conttrapposizione al potere. Barbareschi è connivente a quello stesso potere che dovrebbe mettere alla berlina, quindi evita l'argomento per non porsi in contraddizione. Questo è inaccettabile, dal punto di vista satirico.
Aspetto gravissimo : Barbareschi fa la battuta sul legittimo impedimento e il PdL ne approfitta per sottolineare come "all'interno del partito c'è massima libertà di espressione". In questo modo la "satira" - tra virgolette: in realtà non la è - presta il fianco ad una vulgar trivialization and makes the game of power, nullifying its value disruptive. We are dealing with an artist who trivializes a literary genre that has roots in ancient manforte to give his political party. This is not only intolerable, but it is vulgar and squalid. For this reason it is not permissible that satire on face party newspapers - Il Giornale, L'Unità - or on other newspapers with mass parties have collusion - La Repubblica, Il Corriere della Sera.
Who satire can not have party affiliations. The only way that satire has to keep clear and vital is that people who make it to remain independent forever. So, there are two things: either stop Barbareschi to do satire (and it would be good) or stop doing, Members of the PDL (and desirable). Must break the contradiction. Otherwise it's too easy.
The satire is not easy: it is a responsibility. Too easy to make her hot ass.
